Electric cars are expanding mainly due to the eco-friendly operation. But a new study proves that the electric vehicles are not as ecological as they faces. Are diesel cars more environmentally friendly than electric cars?
Perhaps the most important trend in today’s automotive world is the electrification of cars, a gradual shift from conventional combustion engine models to different hybrids and electric cars. This is mainly motivated by a quest for cleaner drive, hybrids and electricians simply emit less emissions than cars with a combustion engine. However, as the Berylls Strategy Advisors study suggests, electricians may not be as ecological as they are trying to present.
The company, presenting itself as the only relevant consulting company working exclusively for the automotive industry, highlights the ecological threat of electric cars in the form of their lithium-ion accumulators. Depending on where the particular electric car is produced, its battery production produces a high carbon footprint.
According to the company, it is so high that in some countries the electric power takes 10 years to be environmentally friendly compared to a conventional diesel car. Thus, after 10 years of pure, non-emission-free operation, the high emissions emitted during the production of the electric-powered car are compensated. According to the company, the production of 500 kilograms of a heavy battery for an electric vehicle in a fossil fuel factory means a 74% higher carbon emissions than a conventional car.
In particular, in neighboring Germany it is a bit better, but not quite ideal. Berylls estimates that in Germany the driver can run a regular car with a three-and-a-half-year combustion engine or drive 50,000 kilometers with it before the Nissan Leaf electric car is ecologically worthwhile due to its coal-fired power stations. In the Czech Republic, the situation is similar, as the high share of non-renewable resources in electricity generation is similar to that in Germany. Leaf, however, has lower battery capacity (30 kWh) compared to moderner electric cars, and for other cars with larger batteries, the time it takes is longer to pay for emissions.
“Electric cars seem to have a 35 percent reduction in emissions, leaving no emissions during the journey. But when we consider it from production to operation, the situation does not really improve. Electricity generation, including for electric vehicles, is strongly dependent on fossil fuels in many EU countries. And the climate is whether carbon dioxide emissions come from the exhaust, or whether it is released when burning lignite to produce electricity or energy-intensive battery production, “comments Jan Burgard of Berylls.
Electromobiles, perhaps with zero local emissions, will help clean the air in cities, but from a general point of view, they are similarly burdensome for the environment as cars with a combustion engine.
In Germany or Poland, for example, it is still worthwhile for people to drive a diesel-powered car to make a smaller carbon footprint. In these countries, electricity is mainly generated from non-renewable power plants. The same applies to China, which today strongly supports electric cars.
This implies that individual states should focus on emissions emitted throughout the life cycle of a car rather than solely on emissions during its operation. That would make it clear that those bans on cars with the combustion engine do not make any sense … But explain it to the environmental activists.